Larry O. Franklin Not Allowed Around Girls Under 18 Years Of Age, But Hanging Out At The Big Brothers Big Sisters Tent?

LarryFranklin2
Remember Larry Franklin from Sangamon County Protecting It’s Own Again? Larry O. Franklin Gets PROBATION After State Pleads Out Child Sexual Abuse Case! or Sangamon County Sheriff Wes Barr Social Media Campaign Manager Accused Again Of Sex Crime! .

Remember back in March when Larry Franklin here avoided a child sex charge by pleading out to Domestic Battery? Part of his plea deal he was ordered “Defendant is ordered not to live with any females under the age of 18”.
LarryFranklin
On 5/23/2016 the Judge called Mr. Franklin back to court to admonish him about being around underage females. “Entry on status Judge: GRAVES DEFENDANT LARRY FRANKLIN: Present the Defendant in person, pro se. Cause comes on for status hearing. Defendant admonished that he is not to reside anywhere with females under the age of 18. Matter set for Status hearing on 6/7/2016 at 2:30 PM before the honorable Judge LESLIE GRAVES. CLERK TO SEND COPY OF THIS DOCKET TO PARTIES OF RECORD AND PROBATION.”

Well guess he doesn’t care… Take a look at this picture that was sent to us this weekend.
13383514_1292245467471465_40166514_o
Apparently he was hanging out at the Big Brothers Big Sisters Tent Downtown at the SOHO Festival.

Rut Roh Seems like a violation…

Share This:

16 Comments on "Larry O. Franklin Not Allowed Around Girls Under 18 Years Of Age, But Hanging Out At The Big Brothers Big Sisters Tent?"

  1. DrunkenDave Detzburg | June 5, 2016 at 2:12 am | Reply

    Awww, can ya blame him? Any kid showing up to that tent has had half the “breaking in” work done for him. He’s just being economical about it. He’ll probably snag a few from there without having to take em to the Mall, even.

  2. Larry Franklin is not a mentor to any of our children, not around any of our children, has not applied to be a part of our programs. He is in no way formally associated with Big Brothers Big Sisters of the Illinois Capital Region. He was not on our volunteer rotation to work at our booth at SOHO Music Festival, but did stop by several times to talk to our staff and volunteers. We do extensive background checks on all interested volunteers as to ensure the utmost safety for our children.

  3. Voice of Reason | June 5, 2016 at 9:38 pm | Reply

    This “story” is a pretty sad reach to try to stir the pot and potentially sully the name of BB/BS and/or SOHO. The guy, regardless of allegations, has nothing more than a Domestic Battery conviction on his record- on that vein, the owner of this very site has worse convictions on record. Also, how is “residing” equivalent to “volunteering”? Wouldn’t that be like someone with computer tampering convictions running a website?

    • I’m sorry we don’t have an owner you must be mistaken. Nevertheless the fact is the person is allowed no contact with under age kids. Sure hanging out at a booth designed for kids isn’t such a great mix. Hey though more power to you guess Wes Bar’s boy got a reach around deal to not be a child molester. Computer tampering verse touching kids hmm I’ll go with delete a file on a computer server any day.

  4. People Like This Need A 357 Slug In The Back Of The Fucking Head.

  5. Voice of Reason | June 6, 2016 at 12:07 am | Reply

    I’m sorry, but if you don’t have an owner you can’t really be a corporation nor have a website. It doesn’t state he cannot have contact with underage kids, it says he cannot reside anywhere with a minor present. Calling someone a child molester when they haven’t been convicted of it- especially when it’s via a “news” website intended to desseminate information- is beyond your first amendment rights.

    • We are a non profit corporation with a board of directors who operate according to the adopted by laws. Never said he was a child molester check again. The public should be alarmed if someone can’t reside around young women they shouldn’t be out doing what several portrayed as “scouting for young girls” at a booth designed to help kids.

  6. Voice of Reason | June 6, 2016 at 11:47 am | Reply

    The “several” that portrayed him as trying to “scout for young girls” are merely you and yours. Saying that “someone had a reach around deal to not be a child molester” is in effect implying that they are; again that’s borderline slanderous publishing. Do the individuals you feature on your website know that it only takes three of them to file a class action lawsuit?

    • Glad you think you know everything. Clearly someone sent us the picture. Wish you the best of luck though, thank you for your feedback.

    • Another Google lawyer. You don’t know the correct legal term and this site is covered under the 1st amendment, just like National Enquirer, TMZ, OK!…etc…etc.

      I feel bad for those in your life. You feel the need to defend someone who was ordered not to have contact with minors, yet was seen at a place that was probably frequented by minors during the festival. He is one slip-up away from being thrown in jail and having a place on the Sex Offender Registry. Defend the scum and put blame on those who did not act in such a way. Good for you!!

      Would you defend him if he were left alone with your underage child? Or your underage niece? I have a 13-year-old niece and just the thought of someone like this person being around her makes me want to vomit.

  7. But he wasn’t ordered to not be around minors! He was ordered not to live with any. It’s in the docket, posted above! If this site posted the docket they should know the “headline” is incorrect. If you want to be taken seriously for your “journalistic integrity,” you should fix this story. He’s not in danger of being revoked…unles it’s your contention that he lives in a tent at the Soho festival. No one is defending the guy, he’s probably not worth defending, but the integrity of information you distribute to the public is worth defending – 100 times over.

  8. And again Springfield keeps it classy… Defending child molesters & rapists has become the citizens finest quality. This man is not allowed minors yet he’s at a BB/BS event. For the idiot that says he’s only ordered to not live with any minors. You need to wake the fuck up like 2 weeks ago. You’re just as guilty!
    ANYONE THAT DEFENDS A RAPIST OR CHILD MOLESTER IS JUST AS GUILTY!

  9. Oh & Springfield Exposed I’m going to sue you…. LOL! Google Lawyer was the perfect statement for that idiot! There’s always one that thinks they need to defend the rapists and sue somebody. I would love to be in that court room when you try to state that case Bahahaha

  10. Holly Wood? You disagree with the order? I didnt make it up. That’s what it says. Do you want it to say something else? Do you you know if he has to register? Is domestic violence a subsect of the registry? There’s a violent offender against youth registry, did you know that? That’s not rape, or child molestation. Please, it seems like you have infinite time on your hands. Show me where you read not to be around children, the word rape, or the word molestation in public documents. Please don’t confuse defending an individual over the facts…they’re right there. You can read Holly, can’t you?

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*


Copyright © 2017 SpringfieldILExposed.com All Rights Reserved. 

Like Us On Facebook!